Issue 96695 - WW8: formatting of line on top of TOC not preserved on DOC export
Summary: WW8: formatting of line on top of TOC not preserved on DOC export
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 78121
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: save-export (show other issues)
Version: OOO300m9
Hardware: Unknown All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: writerneedsconfirm
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: ms_interoperability
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-11-28 16:05 UTC by unlord
Modified: 2008-12-01 12:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Input file (218.50 KB, application/msword)
2008-11-28 16:06 UTC, unlord 		no flags Details
Output file (206.00 KB, application/msword)
2008-11-28 16:07 UTC, unlord 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description unlord 2008-11-28 16:05:30 UTC 
I have a simple document created with MS Word 2000 that contains a table of
contents (TOC) in which I have changed the "TOC 1" style to include a custom
colored top border:

Border: Top(Single solid line, Custom Color(RGB(75,106,143)), 3/4 pt Line width)

When I open this file in Writer, make no changes, and then Save As... a
different Word 97 file, this style is not preserved.  Instead, the following
style is exported:

Border: Top(Single solid line, Gray-50%, 1/2 pt Line width)

The original style should be preserved in the new Word 97 document file.
Comment 1 unlord 2008-11-28 16:06:45 UTC 
Created attachment 58368 [details]
Input file
Comment 2 unlord 2008-11-28 16:07:09 UTC 
Created attachment 58369 [details]
Output file
Comment 3 unlord 2008-11-28 17:24:50 UTC 
Bug exists in OOO300m9.
Comment 4 cno 2008-11-29 14:29:33 UTC 
If I open in Word 2003 I see the effect > Confirm
Add keyword "ms_interoperability" and put "WW8" in front of summary.
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2008-12-01 12:55:51 UTC 
Already tracked as issue 78121.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 78121 ***
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2008-12-01 12:56:36 UTC 
closing duplicate.