Issue 103583 - Identical objects differ in .pdf. Were identical with 3.0.
Summary: Identical objects differ in .pdf. Were identical with 3.0.
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Draw
Classification: Application
Component: save-export (show other issues)
Version: OOO310m11
Hardware: Unknown All
: P3 Trivial with 4 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: sven.jacobi
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords: regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-16 07:24 UTC by denis0
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:40 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
ODG original (54.04 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.graphics)
2009-07-16 07:25 UTC, denis0
no flags Details
exported in PDF variant (112.33 KB, application/pdf)
2009-07-16 07:26 UTC, denis0
no flags Details
screenshot (286.34 KB, image/png)
2009-07-16 07:53 UTC, kpalagin
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description denis0 2009-07-16 07:24:17 UTC
I have 4 duplicates of one object in my odg file. After PDF-export, this object
looks in 3 variants in pdf-file.

This problem of 3.1 version, in 2.4 and 3.0 - all looks fine.
Comment 1 denis0 2009-07-16 07:25:14 UTC
Created attachment 63579 [details]
ODG original
Comment 2 denis0 2009-07-16 07:26:17 UTC
Created attachment 63580 [details]
exported in PDF variant
Comment 3 kpalagin 2009-07-16 07:52:23 UTC
On attached screenshot please see how two frames with gradient appear in .pdf. 

Circled in red is how 3.1 (and m51) exports - not only it is different from 
3.0, but two identical frames (generated by cloning) substantially differ 
between each other.
Circled in green is pdf generated by 3.0.

Also please note that text shadow is not there at all.
Comment 4 kpalagin 2009-07-16 07:53:27 UTC
Created attachment 63583 [details]
screenshot
Comment 5 wolframgarten 2009-07-16 08:07:19 UTC
Reproducible. Reassigned.
Comment 6 sven.jacobi 2009-09-28 13:00:07 UTC
changed target
Comment 7 sven.jacobi 2011-02-11 11:11:29 UTC
this problem has been fixed somehow, in an actual office (dev300m97) everything
looks good.
Comment 8 sven.jacobi 2011-02-11 11:11:49 UTC
closed