Issue 105161 - ODFF: reference operators ~ and ! have wrong precedence
Summary: ODFF: reference operators ~ and ! have wrong precedence
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: programming (show other issues)
Version: DEV300m55
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: oc
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords: ms_interoperability
Depends on:
Blocks: 99999
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-09-17 23:08 UTC by Regina Henschel
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
precedence testcase with intersection and union reference operators (11.64 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet)
2009-09-17 23:11 UTC, Regina Henschel
no flags Details
Adapted test cases from issue 32341; if exported to .xls Excel shows identical values for the cases it can handle, others are #VALUE! errors. (18.96 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet)
2009-10-05 15:32 UTC, ooo
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Regina Henschel 2009-09-17 23:08:40 UTC
According to spec ODF1.2 chapter 5.5 the intersection has a higher precedence
than union. Therefore an expression like a~b!c should be calculated as a~(b!c)
but it is calculated as (a~b)!c. According to chapter 6.3.12 the latter equals
(a!c)~(b!c).

The attached spreadsheet uses the INDEX function in array context to show which
ranges are contained in the final multiple range result. _a, _b, _c are named
ranges.
Comment 1 Regina Henschel 2009-09-17 23:11:03 UTC
Created attachment 64821 [details]
precedence testcase with intersection and union reference operators
Comment 2 ooo 2009-09-24 13:28:30 UTC
oops.. how embarrassing, it was even documented wrong in the testcase document
http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/51411/i32341_ocunion_2.ods
of feature issue 32341, see cells B15 and B18. The online help has it correct.
Nominating as 3.2 stopper.
Comment 3 ooo 2009-10-05 15:27:29 UTC
In cws calc32stopper3:

revision 276686
formula/source/core/api/FormulaCompiler.cxx
Comment 4 ooo 2009-10-05 15:32:51 UTC
Created attachment 65143 [details]
Adapted test cases from issue 32341; if exported to .xls Excel shows identical values for the cases it can handle, others are #VALUE! errors.
Comment 5 ooo 2009-10-13 17:10:40 UTC
Reassigning to QA for verification.
Comment 6 oc 2009-10-16 12:37:54 UTC
verified in internal build cws_calc32stopper3