Issue 106406 - Sheet protection (with password) can easily be cracked
Summary: Sheet protection (with password) can easily be cracked
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 60305
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.1.1
Hardware: PC Windows Vista
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: spreadsheet
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-29 00:00 UTC by kauboy
Modified: 2009-10-29 20:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Demo kit (7.88 KB, application/x-compressed)
2009-10-29 10:26 UTC, Rainer Bielefeld
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description kauboy 2009-10-29 00:00:58 UTC
I have a Calc document which has password protected cells/sheets and saved as
ods. If I open it normally in OpenOffice and try to remove the sheet protection,
I'm asked for the password. However, if I take the very same document and open
it, then store it as XLS and open this Excel-document in OpenOffice, I can
remove the sheet protection without being asked for the password!
Comment 1 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-10-29 07:53:18 UTC
NOT Reproducible with "Ooo 3.1.1 WIN XP DE-multilingual version German UI
activated [OOO310m19 (Build 9420)]"!

@kauboy:
Please attach a test kit!
Comment 2 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-10-29 10:25:14 UTC
Also NOT reproducible with "Ooo-Dev 3.2.0 multilingual version English UI WIN
XP: [OOO320m2 (Build 9432)]"!

@kauboy:
What is your result with my "probaplyunprotected.xls" from "demokit.zip",
protected or not protected?
Please attach a similar test kit!
Comment 3 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-10-29 10:26:12 UTC
Created attachment 65745 [details]
Demo kit
Comment 4 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-10-29 10:34:29 UTC
I'm sorry, I did not read carefully enough. I CAN reproduce the problem, and
this one is a DUP of Issue 60305


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 60305 ***
Comment 5 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-10-29 10:35:21 UTC
.
Comment 6 kauboy 2009-10-29 20:30:18 UTC
Agreed, this is a duplicate of 60305. Hope somebody will work on fixing this bug
soon.