Issue 117386 - unit test complex.sfx2.GlobalEventBroadcaster fails
Summary: unit test complex.sfx2.GlobalEventBroadcaster fails
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 115674
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: DEV300m101
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P3 Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: carsten.driesner
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords: regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-15 13:15 UTC by Frank Schönheit
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Frank Schönheit 2011-03-15 13:15:06 UTC 
running the GlobalEventBroadcaster unit test from sfx2 via
  $ cd sfx2/qa/complex/sfx2
  $ OOO_SUBSEQUENT_TESTS=true dmake javatest_GlobalEventBroadcaster
results in

There was 1 failure:
1) checkWriter(complex.sfx2.GlobalEventBroadcaster)
java.lang.AssertionError: Wrong events fired when opening empty doc
        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
        at complex.sfx2.GlobalEventBroadcaster.checkWriter(GlobalEventBroadcaster.java:119)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
        at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
        at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:136)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:117)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.runMain(JUnitCore.java:98)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.runMainAndExit(JUnitCore.java:53)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.main(JUnitCore.java:45)

FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 1,  Failures: 1
Comment 1 carsten.driesner 2011-03-18 10:04:16 UTC 
cd: Take over.
Comment 2 Frank Schönheit 2011-03-18 14:06:06 UTC 
oops - this test was commented out in the makefile, due to issue 115674 - resolving as duplicate.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 115674 ***
Comment 3 carsten.driesner 2011-03-18 14:09:10 UTC 
cd: Closed. Issue is resolved, duplicate.
Comment 4 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2012-06-13 12:24:26 UTC 
getting rid of value "enhancement" for field "severity".
For enhancement the field "issue type" shall be used.