Issue 20920 - bad figure placement in Word document
Summary: bad figure placement in Word document
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 17086
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: ms_interoperability, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-08 22:20 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Word document with badly placed figure (121.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-10-08 22:21 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-10-08 22:20:06 UTC 
I got this document prepared using Microsoft Word, and the figures are badly 
placed.  In the example I will attach, if I can figure out how, the word 
processor has managed to split the figure over two pages.

Richard.
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-10-08 22:21:15 UTC 
Created attachment 10135 [details]
Word document with badly placed figure
Comment 2 utomo99 2003-10-09 04:26:46 UTC 
I can Reproduce the problem on 
OpenOffice 1.1 (default Install, US), Win XP Pro Sp1. 
(And MS Office XP Sp2). 
It is real problem

when we open the doc in OOo look at page 3, or page 2/3 in OOo. 
Figure 1: On Demand Web service environment
the figure is misplaced.
Comment 3 mci 2003-10-09 08:15:40 UTC 
set target to OOo2.o
reassigned to mru
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2003-10-09 12:19:07 UTC 
MRU->CMC: The drawing group is "in line with text", but after import
it is anchored to paragraph (with "wrapping through"). When anchoring
the group manually "as character" after import, everything looks fine.
Comment 5 caolanm 2003-10-09 17:43:56 UTC 
Yes, same as issue 17086, done in kilkennyfilterteam14 for 2.0

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 17086 ***
Comment 6 caolanm 2003-10-21 09:17:04 UTC 
reopen to reassign
Comment 7 caolanm 2003-10-21 09:17:22 UTC 
in kilkennyfilterteam14
Comment 8 caolanm 2003-10-21 09:17:49 UTC 
set back to duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 17086 ***
Comment 9 michael.ruess 2003-10-29 09:36:13 UTC 
Yeah, it's the same problem and also fixed in OO 2.0.
Comment 10 Unknown 2003-10-29 14:32:14 UTC 
Great.  So how do I get OO 2.0?

Richard.
Comment 11 michael.ruess 2003-11-04 14:55:19 UTC 
The first milestone of OO 2.0 might be released beginning of next
year, I guess. But this hasn't been scheduled yet by the staff.