Issue 21424 - Compare documents shows the changes in the second document instead of the current one
Summary: Compare documents shows the changes in the second document instead of the cur...
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P4 Trivial with 6 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
: 112122 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-19 18:20 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-10-19 18:20:29 UTC
Document comparison (Edit->Compare document) is non-intuitive. Instead of
showing the changes that are needed to current document to make it like the
second document it shows the opposite. This has the nasty effect that when user
finishes comparing two files and doesn't want to make any changes to original
file and selects "Reject All" (think cancel). In worst case user then presses
"Save" before noticing that the original document has changed.

I can think of few ways to fix this:
1. Change the comparison order. I would like it this way but it would just make
it difficult for those who are used to do "Accept All".
2. Add Cancel-button that returns the document back to original.
3. Open differences into new document so that clicking "Save" opens "Save
as"-dialog instead of overwriting original document.
Comment 1 con.hennessy 2003-10-20 11:42:28 UTC
confirmed on 1.1.0 
Comment 2 h.ilter 2003-10-21 11:34:33 UTC
Reassigned to ES
Comment 3 eric.savary 2003-10-23 17:56:06 UTC
To Uxer Experience for evaluation
Comment 4 thetrivialstuff 2009-05-23 21:26:12 UTC
Will somebody please fix this? It's annoyed me at least as long as this 
complaint has been up.

I don't care which order the comparison operation works in, as long as it's 
more clearly labelled in the UI. Since this feature has been backwards for so 
long, it probably can't be changed at this point because it would mess up 
everyone who's learned it the way it is now.

However, there might be some merit in changing it since we still have a 
minority market share and MS Office does it the other way around (one less 
thing for converts to complain about).

So, in order of preference, here are the solutions I suggest:

- Fix the backwardness entirely, and make it so that to compare two documents 
the user opens the older document, and then selects the newer revision from 
Edit > Compare Documents.

- Offer a choice while viewing the document to see either "Changes from 
file1.odt to file2.odt" or "Changes from file2.odt to file1.odt" so that the 
order in which the user opened the files doesn't matter. Also offer "just 
file1.odt" and "just file2.odt" the way MS Office does (equivalent to "Final 
document only" and "Original document only", but adding the filenames makes it 
much clearer which document is which). If the filenames are the same, show 
differences in the path, e.g. "The document in /home/user/e-mail attachments" 
and "The document in /home/user/Documents".

- Show the filenames alongside hilighted edits, to make it really clear whether 
a bit of text is from file1.odt or file2.odt .

- Provide both options by modifying the the file chooser dialogue for Edit > 
Compare Documents. It would be awesome if the dialogue said "the document I am 
selecting is [Older] [Newer] than the current one" and let the user pick the 
default behaviour, so that those of us who use both OpenOffice and MSOffice can 
make them behave the same.
Comment 5 meywer 2009-10-10 12:43:11 UTC
I would like to vot for that, but issue 69811 still doesn't allow me...
Comment 6 meywer 2009-10-10 12:43:17 UTC
I would like to vote for that, but issue 69811 still doesn't allow me...
Comment 7 bettina.haberer 2010-05-21 14:45:46 UTC
To grep the issues easier via "requirements" I put the issues currently lying on
my owner to the owner "requirements". 
Comment 8 eric.savary 2010-06-06 13:13:45 UTC
Updated summary.
Comment 9 eric.savary 2010-06-06 13:18:41 UTC
*** Issue 112122 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***