Issue 31799 - Accounting underline format similar to excel
Summary: Accounting underline format similar to excel
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 23839
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: spreadsheet
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
: 39682 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-07-20 21:35 UTC by rockyd
Modified: 2005-01-13 16:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
OO vs Excel underline output (10.18 KB, application/pdf)
2004-07-20 21:45 UTC, rockyd 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description rockyd 2004-07-20 21:35:35 UTC 
I really like OO and I use it daily for various reports even though I also use 
excel.  The thing that keeps me from using it for all reports is the 
formatting for accounting.  In excel, I can choose to format in accounting 
format, the main thing this effects is the underline function.  The underline  
has a much more consistent width in excel as opposed to OO.  I have copied and 
pasted the custom formatting code from excel into OO spreadsheet but I do not  
have the same underline results as excel.  This sounds silly, but for 
accountants who do financial statements, neatness in the output matters.  I am 
the CFO for an $80M company.  I love OO primarily for the output to pdf files 
which saves me a ton of time.
Comment 1 rockyd 2004-07-20 21:45:58 UTC 
Created attachment 16633 [details]
OO vs Excel underline output
Comment 2 frank 2004-07-21 08:44:15 UTC 
Hi,

this is a double to Issue 23839 which has currently two Votes. If you want this
feature, just add as many votes as you can. The more votes, the creater the
chance that it would be implemented.

Frank

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 23839 ***
Comment 3 frank 2004-07-21 08:44:34 UTC 
closed double
Comment 4 frank 2005-01-13 16:14:53 UTC 
*** Issue 39682 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***