Issue 39264 - Formula should be vertically alignable by selecting a character
Summary: Formula should be vertically alignable by selecting a character
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 972
Alias: None
Product: Math
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: requirements
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-12-18 22:25 UTC by ooo
Modified: 2010-11-10 16:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
formula too low (2.39 KB, image/png)
2004-12-18 22:27 UTC, ooo 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ooo 2004-12-18 22:25:54 UTC 
Example:
When writing a fraction, where the numerator is again a fraction, the equal-sign
will not be at the same level as the text left and right of the formula. 
(see screenshot.png)

It would be adequate to select a character (in this case: the "=") and tell the
formula to align itself vertically so that the selected character matches the
level of the characters of the surrounding text.

gisbert
Comment 1 ooo 2004-12-18 22:27:00 UTC 
Created attachment 20636 [details]
formula too low
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2004-12-23 15:35:59 UTC 
MRU->TL: befor this is reassigned to "requirements... do you know a possibility
how to align this vertically centered to the equal sign?
Comment 3 thomas.lange 2005-01-03 11:14:06 UTC 
TL: request for enhancement. Passing on to respective account.
Comment 4 jmgervais 2005-01-13 20:48:15 UTC 
I think it would be better and natural with the #972 issue.
(Correct alignment on the baseline).
This 'natural' position should be the default one.

Indeed, this alignment is correct inside the formula editor, so it's could be
possible to get line level from Math to Writer...
Comment 5 ooo 2005-03-09 16:37:23 UTC 
No improvement in Beta 1.9.79
Comment 6 lohmaier 2005-08-30 18:56:06 UTC 
marking duplicate.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 972 ***
Comment 7 lohmaier 2005-08-30 18:57:50 UTC 
closing duplicate.
Comment 8 comtelicon 2010-11-10 16:08:18 UTC 
Created attachment 73092