Issue 5797 - Why this frame positioning ?
Summary: Why this frame positioning ?
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 642
Hardware: All Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: ms_interoperability
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-06-13 13:05 UTC by caolanm
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Example .sxw (9.30 KB, application/octet-stream)
2002-06-13 13:05 UTC, caolanm 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description caolanm 2002-06-13 13:05:13 UTC 
cmc->ama: In the example .sxw I wonder why the frame is placed where it is,
should it not be positioned 1.27 cm underneath the previous line ?
Comment 1 caolanm 2002-06-13 13:05:39 UTC 
Created attachment 1945 [details]
Example .sxw
Comment 2 andreas.martens 2002-06-13 14:40:23 UTC 
ama: The format/frame dialog shows me as position "Vertical From top
by 0,71 cm to Margin". And there it is! The margin is the top of the
anchor paragraph. The distance between paragraphs belongs in our
implementation to the second paragraph even it is cause by the first
paragraph with a bottom distance attribute. So far, so good.
If you want the frame 1.27cm below the first line, you can change the
value to 1.27cm and it works fine. The alternative is to place the
frame at the top of the "text area" instead "margin".
And now the bug I found in this area: if you choose "vertical from top
by x cm to text area" the x cm will be measured from the text margin
and not from the text area. There's no effect when you change between
margin and text area. This has to be fixed.
ama->cmc: Do you see another problem?
Comment 3 caolanm 2002-06-13 15:04:02 UTC 
I should have said "an extra 1.27cm" underneath and I could never get
a handle on the margin/text margin difference, and how it was supposed
to work, "The distance between paragraphs belongs in our
implementation to the second paragraph even it is caused by the first
paragraph with a bottom distance attribute." really clears something
up, I have been imagining....

text text text
<after space>
--------------imaginary line between paragraphs, the text margin
<before space>
text text test

So it is really ...

text text text
--------------imaginary line between paragraphs, the text margin
<after space from previous para>
<before space>
text text test
Comment 4 andreas.martens 2002-06-13 16:15:10 UTC 
And we have another behaviour, when the
tools/options/textdocument/general/compatibility flag
"Add spacing between paragraphs and tables in current document"
is _not_ set:

text text text
--------------imaginary line between paragraphs, the text margin
Maximum( <after space from previous para>, <before space> )
text text test
Comment 5 andreas.martens 2003-09-11 15:56:07 UTC 
.
Comment 6 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2003-09-16 09:59:36 UTC 
OD (16.09.2003):
Meanwhile, a more general issue has been submitted for this issue.
It's an enhancement for the next version.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11860 ***
Comment 7 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2003-09-29 10:03:17 UTC 
.
Comment 8 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2004-02-24 10:37:42 UTC 
OD->MRU: Please take care of this duplicate, Thx.
Comment 9 michael.ruess 2004-06-17 14:46:18 UTC 
Fixed.
Comment 10 michael.ruess 2004-06-17 14:46:44 UTC 
Closed.