Issue 77273 - RPT: Ctrl-Shift-DnD of a field creates label field in page footer
Summary: RPT: Ctrl-Shift-DnD of a field creates label field in page footer
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: recent-trunk
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.x
Assignee: Frank Schönheit
QA Contact: issues@dba
URL:
Keywords: new_implementation
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-05-12 12:51 UTC by Frank Schönheit
Modified: 2007-06-18 14:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
document to reproduce the bug case (227.62 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.base)
2007-05-12 12:52 UTC, Frank Schönheit 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Frank Schönheit 2007-05-12 12:51:53 UTC 
- open the attached database
- open the report "countries, empty" for editing
- open the field list floating window
- drag and drop an arbitrary field from this window to the detail section,
  pressing Ctrl-Shift when releasing the mouse
=> This expected to create two controls - one bound, one being a label -
   in different sections. It actually does, but the label is created in the
   page footer, which is nonsense.
Comment 1 Frank Schönheit 2007-05-12 12:52:26 UTC 
Created attachment 45071 [details]
document to reproduce the bug case
Comment 2 Frank Schönheit 2007-05-12 12:52:36 UTC 
This is a new implementation in CWS oj14. Adding keyword "new_implementation",
targeting to OOo 2.x.
Comment 3 ocke.janssen 2007-05-14 07:39:40 UTC 
You have to possibility to choose between header and footer.
-> CTRL > header
CTRL+Shift > footer

It's no bug it's a feature.
Comment 4 ocke.janssen 2007-05-14 07:40:03 UTC 
.
Comment 5 Frank Schönheit 2007-05-14 08:25:13 UTC 
Ah, didn't know this! Would I have found this in the specification if I had
looked there? :)
Comment 6 marc.neumann 2007-06-18 14:08:27 UTC 
> Would I have found this in the specification?

Yes, in the current spec (cvs version 1.5) you find this behavior.