Issue 77278 - RPT: Wrong horizontal positioning of group footer data in bug doc
Summary: RPT: Wrong horizontal positioning of group footer data in bug doc
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: recent-trunk
Hardware: All All
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.3
Assignee: marc.neumann
QA Contact: issues@dba
URL:
Keywords: new_implementation
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-05-12 13:12 UTC by Frank Schönheit
Modified: 2008-01-23 21:14 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
document to reproduce the bug case (218.54 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.base)
2007-05-12 13:12 UTC, Frank Schönheit
no flags Details
changed example (218.45 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.base)
2007-09-11 18:04 UTC, andreschnabel
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Frank Schönheit 2007-05-12 13:12:01 UTC
- open the database document c03.odb
- open the report therein for editing
- execute the report
=> The population sum displayed in the group footer is not aligned with
   the population value(s) in the group's detail section. For instance,
   the "40583573" and the "29114497" for South Africa resp. Morocco
   are properly aligned, but the sum "69698070" which is displayed in the
   footer isn't.
   In the design of the report, both the "population" and "population count"
   control start at 8.22 cm.
Comment 1 Frank Schönheit 2007-05-12 13:12:39 UTC
Created attachment 45075 [details]
document to reproduce the bug case
Comment 2 Frank Schönheit 2007-05-12 13:12:59 UTC
This is a new implementation in CWS oj14. Adding keyword "new_implementation",
targeting to OOo 2.x.
Comment 3 Frank Schönheit 2007-05-15 09:35:04 UTC
The Report Designer iTeam decided that this issue is a show stopper for the
release of the report designer. Targeting to 2.3, thus.
Comment 4 ocke.janssen 2007-05-21 09:41:20 UTC
office:value has to be replaced by the value from the database for cells
Comment 5 ocke.janssen 2007-05-21 09:42:58 UTC
Sorry wrong issue :-)
Comment 6 frank.meies 2007-05-25 15:57:11 UTC
Fixed in cws oj14, sw/source/filter/xml/xmltbli.cxx, rev. 1.54.8.3
Comment 7 ocke.janssen 2007-06-01 09:42:02 UTC
Please check. Thanks. If not fixed send it back to fme who fixed the issue :-)
Comment 8 marc.neumann 2007-06-14 09:42:44 UTC
verified in CWS oj14 version 0.4.0. The alignment if fixed.
Comment 9 Mechtilde 2007-06-15 13:09:00 UTC
It seems to be fixed

To see it better I try to change he formaating of the values to use the
thousands point.

but this doesn't work :(
Comment 10 Frank Schönheit 2007-06-15 18:47:31 UTC
The wrong formatting is issue 77039, resp. one of its many duplicates. It's not
yet fixed in 0.4.0, but in an internal build.
Comment 11 Mechtilde 2007-08-09 09:19:21 UTC
I want to confirm the fix

But I cant execute the Report with  m222+localisation21
Comment 12 Mechtilde 2007-09-08 22:33:27 UTC
I execute the fs' description.
I change the background to grey and execute the report
I get the error message: "Beim Erstellen des Berichts trat ein Fehler auf"

And as information
"Eine Ausnahme vom Typ com.sun.star.lang.WrappedTargetException wurde entdeckt."
caught a com.sun.star.report.ReportExecutionException

So I reopen this Issue
Comment 13 pavel 2007-09-11 18:01:14 UTC
Move target to 2.3.1.
Comment 14 andreschnabel 2007-09-11 18:03:36 UTC
there is still a small gap between detail and group footer elements.

Please have a look at my changed example. 
Comment 15 andreschnabel 2007-09-11 18:04:26 UTC
Created attachment 48184 [details]
changed example
Comment 16 Frank Schönheit 2007-09-11 20:34:11 UTC
Andre, I can confirm the gap, but please submit a separate issue for this - it
is pretty different from what this issue is originally about.
Comment 17 Frank Schönheit 2007-09-11 20:42:28 UTC
Mechtilde, the inability to execute the original bug doc is also a issue
different from the original one. While it is a very valid and severe problem
(thus now submitted as issue 81510), it still is different - and there are good
reasons to keep it different in IZ, too. See
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/basic_rules.html#one_per_issue, please.

Closing this one as FIXED, again.
Comment 18 Mechtilde 2008-01-23 21:14:15 UTC
-> closed